In today's article we are going to delve into the topic of Online Etymology Dictionary, a topic that has aroused great interest in recent years. Online Etymology Dictionary is an area of study that has captured the attention of academics, experts and enthusiasts alike, and has generated debate and research in various fields. From its impact on society to its implications in everyday life, Online Etymology Dictionary has proven to be a relevant and constantly evolving topic. In this article, we will explore different aspects and perspectives of Online Etymology Dictionary, in order to shed light on this fascinating topic and provide a more complete view of its importance in today's world.
Douglas R. Harper, an American Civil War historian and copy editor for LNP Media Group, compiled the etymology dictionary to record the history and evolution of more than 50,000 words, including slang and technical terms. The core body of its etymology information stems from The Barnhart Dictionary of Etymology by Robert Barnhart, Ernest Klein's Comprehensive Etymology Dictionary of the English Language, The Middle English Compendium, The Oxford English Dictionary, and the 1889–1902 Century Dictionary. Harper also researches on digital archives. On the Etymonline homepage, Harper says that he considers himself "essentially and for the most part" a compiler and evaluator of etymology research made by others.
Reviews and reputation
The Online Etymology Dictionary has been referenced by Oxford University's "Arts and Humanities Community Resource" catalog as "an excellent tool for those seeking the origins of words" and cited in the Chicago Tribune as one of the "best resources for finding just the right word". It is cited in academic work as a useful, though not definitive, reference for etymology. In addition, it has been used as a data source for quantitative scholarly research.
^Hultgren, Anna Kristina (2013). "Lexical borrowing from English into Danish in the Sciences: An empirical investigation of 'domain loss'". International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 23 (2): 166–182. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2012.00324.x.