In today's article we are going to talk about Wikipedia:Liar liar pants on fire, a topic that has undoubtedly generated interest and controversy in recent times. Wikipedia:Liar liar pants on fire is a topic that has captured the attention of experts and the general public, since it impacts different aspects of our daily lives. Throughout this article, we will explore the different facets of Wikipedia:Liar liar pants on fire, from its history and evolution to its impact on today's society. Additionally, we will examine possible solutions and alternatives to address the challenges associated with Wikipedia:Liar liar pants on fire. Lastly, we will look at how Wikipedia:Liar liar pants on fire has influenced the world today and what we can expect in the future.
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
This page in a nutshell: Calling an editor a liar is not a valid argument in AfD discussions (or anywhere else, for that matter).
Calling editors liars
Note anyway that most Wikipedians cannot be liars, as their faces wouldn't fit in front of their telescreens.
Example:
Keep Evidence supports that the subject is notable. Keeper 04:01, 4 April 2004 (UTC)
Delete You're just making that up! LiarLiar 04:15, 4 April 2004 (UTC)
Delete I don't think these sources are reliable or substantial. SourceSkeptic 04:51, 4 April 2004 (UTC)
Keep Actually they're more than enough by any honest interpretation of notability. BeHonest 05:03, 4 April 2004 (UTC)
Simply calling another editor a "liar" (which is a personal attack) or even stating that the editor is incorrect is not a reason to keep or delete any article on Wikipedia. If the editor is incorrectly quoting, misapplying information, misinterpreting data, or otherwise simply misinformed, a useful response is to provide a reference to the correct information.
If an editor makes a statement and holds it out as a fact without proper sourcing, it is more than fair to ask for sources. At the same time, it is best to always assume good faith among your fellow editors.
